Topic closed The Lounge • MacHeist hurts Shareware?
I'm just curious if anyone besides me has avoiding buying shareware lately, hoping to get stuff in the bundle instead. I almost feel bad, but without risking duplicates, I don't really feel I have any other options. How are other people treating this?
Here is an interesting article regarding free/super deals on shareware from John Gruber (Daring Fireball). For me his analysis isn't true because I fully intend to purchase future versions of any of the software I get here that I use. I do however worry that it might hold true overall.
I'm pretty big on supporting both freeware (donations) and shareware (paying for it and word of mouth) I use so I'm hoping this isn't as much of a hurt to some developers as he makes out. Once I've evaluated the versions of things I've gotten here enough I'm almost positive I'll find a few that are worth coughing up some dough for upgrades. I don't at all consider myself a cheapskate (as he put it), just a careful shopper.
It doesn't exactly fit what you're saying but definitely related. I am holding off on purchasing a couple things due to MH but I don't consider that a bad thing. If I find something I like better through this or just something I like enough to keep using then it might just be a different dev that gets my money in the future instead of the one that would have gotten it now. It's helping me find a couple/few things I may have never come across as well.
It would be interesting to hear what other people around here think of his article. How many of you think you'll end up supporting any of the apps you get here for free in the future?
"It has become appallingly clear that our technology has surpassed our humanity."
- Albert Einstein
I've been holding off buying shareware too. But I don't think of this as hurting the industry, rather it's a giant advertisement. Most of the developers who've given apps as part of the loot also have other products that people are going to want to try. I mean, before this, I'd never heard of most of the apps in my loot, but now I'm going to try them all and maybe get addicted to a few. If I do end up liking a particular app, chances are I'm going to be loyal to that developer or product, i.e. 1Passwd or Chat Transcript.
We get free apps. Devs get free advertisement. Everybody wins.
Last edited by kja (November 21, 2006 12:04 am)
It's not the free stuff I'm disputing though. As much as those are full versions, they're still limited. It's the full stuff we're getting in the bundle that puts me off.
Wasgo wrote:
It's not the free stuff I'm disputing though. As much as those are full versions, they're still limited. It's the full stuff we're getting in the bundle that puts me off.
In regards to that specifically I don't think it's any kind of problem unless it includes some of the "upgrades for life" apps. I worry about those sometimes because I've seen it done for some truly great pieces of software and I don't want them to stop being developed at any point.
For the ones that I own I plan on asking the devs for a way to donate once/if I upgrade to a point that there are a number of handy features added or improved. That's about the best I can do and maybe I'm worrying for nothing. Sometimes I think great products are begun without the most sound business plan. More people need to take business classes before starting a business.
If it's a normal process where I'll have to pay to upgrade to the next full version I don't think it's a big deal. They'll be getting more money from me then.
Last edited by Ćnima (November 21, 2006 12:37 am)
"It has become appallingly clear that our technology has surpassed our humanity."
- Albert Einstein
Rory Prior of ThinkMac Software recently posted this: http://www.thinkmac.co.uk/blog/2006/11/ … -your.html
I never buy shareware, and these heists will probably finally convince me to, either from upgrading the apps I've won or buying the bundle.
I think that it's beneficial for shareware developers on the whole (especially if they participated in MacHeist) because it convinces people like me to start supporting the mac shareware community. As for those who are holding off all purchases, Macheist will end and you will still buy (or if you won it, likely pay for an upgrade when the time comes, since you were planning on buying in the first place).
Last edited by mdmunoz (November 21, 2006 1:28 am)
Macheist and My Dream App have gotten me thinking more about buying shareware. Before I never did, now I feel like dropping 30 bucks or so for a program that works very well is worth it.
So there ya go!
same here, for a long time Shapeshifter was the only app i had ever bought...until this summer with CandyBar, SuperDuper, Deskshade, Disco...it was a bit of a splurge, but i enjoy supporting these devs...especially when i see them involved in stuff like MDA and MH...its a give and take relationship ![]()
skimpson, you know what's interesting about your post? Two of the apps you listed haven't been involved in any promotions at all. While I admit these things get me to buy more shareware, I'm actually more likely to buy from companies who haven't discounted their software.
kja wrote:
We get free apps. Devs get free advertisement. Everybody wins.
I totally agree with you. I've buyed many little shareware apps like Transmit, SubEthaEdit, CSSEdit, etc. They're handy and useful and I don't need anything bigger than this tools.
I'm working for a company doing software development and selling their own products, so I know about what it means to live by other people who spend money into software.
And just I can't understand people pirating software. It's like stealing a car or a anything else.
MacHeist hurts Shareware?
Doesn't hurt me.
Reject image over substance...
code: ▛▞▞▟ Proud Member of the BLUE Team™ ▙▚▚▜
Mr. Gruber has a lot of expereinece in software development, I've got to wonder if he might be right.
I make cool Mac Shirts http://hipp.myshopify.com
Cassiel wrote:
And just I can't understand people pirating software. It's like stealing a car or a anything else.
More like copying a car, but hey, details ![]()
You should also remember that not everyone has a credit card (I don't have one, and very few people around here have one.) So every time you do want to pay for an app, you have to go ask someone that does have one (I know 2 people personally that have access to a credit card. 1 has a company CC, other one his mom has a CC) You can ask em once, ask em twice, but they both have to justify every CC use to someone else.
Then we have paypal. Yes, paypal is nice, but again you need a credit card! (can't money transfer to paypal around here...) So now I have to put a larger amount of money on my paypal, to anticipate future purchases.
All well and done, and then the next app you would be willing to pay for doesn't support paypal...
And then you have parts of the world where money isn't so easily available. Where $25 is a LOT of money.
And then there are cheapskates, and downright pirates. I don't deny their existence.
I personally? I'm a mix of all 3. I pay for some apps, don't want to pay for others. And sometimes, it's just easier and faster to find a hacked serial then it is to get one of my CC friends, and ask them if they can buy me yet another app off the internet.
Personally, I'd like to see something like iTMS. A unified front for selling software. Maybe with something like gift certificates? That, or see every single one of the independent software developers support paypal, and paypal finally allowing money transfer in belgium, damnit!
Ćnima wrote:
Here is an interesting article regarding free/super deals on shareware from John Gruber (Daring Fireball). For me his analysis isn't true because I fully intend to purchase future versions of any of the software I get here that I use. I do however worry that it might hold true overall. ...
Thanks for the link. I posted my thoughts here:
http://softwaretrenches.com/2006/11/giv … ceive.html
Who cares? The developers agreed to have the apps discounted or given away. They wanted this.
If anything, I think it will make me WANT to buy more shareware!
a lot of times this type of promotion (giving away free limited upgrade versions of software) is timed right around the start of a new product cycle so in 3-6 months they may release a new version .. its a trend I noticed on a few maczot apps that went for free
My Drinking team has a Hockey problem
roustem wrote:
Thanks for the link. I posted my thoughts here:
http://softwaretrenches.com/2006/11/giv … ceive.html
Good read, I agree with almost all the points you made there. I think there is definitely some over-generalization happening in some of the stories popping up throughout the web. Oh and I dugg it.
"It has become appallingly clear that our technology has surpassed our humanity."
- Albert Einstein
See, I'm not sure how much over-generalization there is. It does apply for me. As I see it there are four types of developers that sell online:
Pratically Retail: Like OmniGroup or DEVON technologies.
Top Tier Shareware: Like Panic.com or Textmate.
Mid Tier Shareware and Bottom Tier: I don't want to offend anyone so I won't list these.
For me, if someone like OmniGroup or DEVON offers a heavy discount, I consider myself very, very lucky. I don't think less of the company and it'll make me more likely to buy. A small discount is the same. If, however, they give away a product, while I still consider them practically retail, I no longer will consider that product practically retail. It's now the black sheep of their product line. If they give it away, why should I want it?
For top tier shareware, my response is pretty much the same. However, if they give away a product, it often lowers my belief in them. Consider Disco. Prior to the Maczot promo, I considered the developer a top tier one. After, I mentally demoted it. If they don't have enough faith for the product to sell, I lose faith in them.
For midrange and bottom tier, if they give something away, I just write it off. I might use it, but even if I do, I will never be able to convince myself to pay full price for it. Similar for heavy discounts. So, while they may gain exposure, it drastically limits what I consider their product to be worth.
Essentially what it comes down to, is the first price I see for an application, I consider to be 'the' price' for an application. If the first price is a give-away or a MacZOT, it would take a lot for me to ever consider it worth its full price.
The only time I find that giveaways don't diminish what I think about a product is when they give away the current version right before a major upgrade, such as when iClip 3 was given away. Other than that, as awful as it sounds, I'd probably look for software that didn't participate next time I'm looking to buy shareware. It my not be fair, but it's my natural reaction.
Last edited by Wasgo (November 21, 2006 7:50 pm)
I think John Gruber's analysis is very interesting... I think that maybe MacHeist will hurt some shareware in some ways and help it in other ways. I certainly can't complain for what I'm getting though!
Back on my two feet
Personally, things like MacHeist and MacZot make me want to buy more shareware. I have bought Disco through MacZot (I feel bad about that... I got a license to AppZapper for free, then I got two licenses for Disco for free PLUS a LaCie LightScribe drive. I am probably making Austin Sarner lose money
) I have also purchased BluePhoneElite, DoubleTake, and A-Dock this summer. A bit of a shareware binge.
-Chris
Have you gotten the LightScribe yet? I'm curious to know what you think of how it works.
"It has become appallingly clear that our technology has surpassed our humanity."
- Albert Einstein
I have a LightScribe capable drive on a PC I don't use anymore, it is a neat toy, but increases burn time dramatically and the novelty wears off rather quickly but YMMV
My Drinking team has a Hockey problem
i can probably write a long winded response to this debate, but in the end.... because of maczot, mac heist and mydreamapp; i now purchase software. Previously i would crack or find cracks for anything i used. Now i dont. i have bought stuff that i dont even use that often. I just liked the app and the developers work, i thought the app had lots of potential for future versions and i bought it to contribute now and hope it pays of later.
i dont see this hurting anything in the long term... though short term there is definately going to be some loss of profit.
Topic closed
Pages: 1 2